in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, Llc
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman
In this mandamus proceeding, we consider whether the proportionate-responsibility scheme in Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 1 applies to a civil-remedy action under the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act (TMFPA). 2 The trial court held Chapter 33 inapplicable, struck the relators' third-party petition seeking contribution under Chapter 33, and denied the relators' motion to designate responsible third parties. 3 The court of appeals denied mandamus relief, 4 as do we. Chapter 33 does not apply to a TMFPA action because (1) the statutory remedy does not constitute…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Dr. Behzad Nazari, D.D.S. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Anadarko E&P Company, L.P. v. Houston Casualty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- in Re: The Commitment of George Weldon Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2018
- Angela Kate Whittenburg Wang v. John Burkhart Whittenburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025
- CCPA Enterprises, Inc. and Rickey Conradt v. Bedford Hospitality Investments, LLC D/B/A Holiday Inn - Bedford, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.