State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant appeals the district court’s dismissal, on jurisdictional grounds, of his motion to withdraw his plea, arguing that: (1) the court had subject matter jurisdiction to consider his motion and inherent authority to review his sentence; (2) the plea procedure was fundamentally flawed and therefore invalid; (3) there were fair and just reasons to withdraw his plea; and (4) the Vermont Department of Corrections misapplied the Interstate Compact on Probation. We find unavailing the State’s after-the-fact jurisdictional challenge to defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- In re B.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Vermont Union School District No. 21 v. H. P. Cummings Construction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- State v. KnutsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Handverger v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. Allan WashburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Burlington School District v. Adam Provost and Seven DaysSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- State v. Randy F. TherrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022