Legal Opinion

State v. Knutsen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 2003No. 27346, 27641PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

David A. Knutsen pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1508. Knutsen argues on appeal that his due process rights were violated during his probation revocation hearing, that the evidence was not sufficient to prove any probation violations, and that the district court abused its discretion in revoking his probation and in imposing an excessive sentence. The state raises the additional argument that the district court did not have jurisdiction under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 to grant probation after entering its order relinquishing jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Knutsen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Jason Zane GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. GoodlettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. SanchezIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API