Legal Opinion

Willis v. Westerfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2004No. 49A02-0211-CV-930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Ann and Jeff Willis (collectively, "the Willises") allege that they should be granted a new trial as to damages on several grounds. Because we find that Christopher Westerfield never conceded liability, we reject the Willises' contention that the trial court erred by allowing the jury to determine fault. Next, we find that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on the affirmative defense of- sudden emer-geney when Westerfield waived this defense by not raising it in his pleadings. We find this error harmless, however, because the jury did not predicate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Paint Shuttle, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mroz v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API