Legal Opinion

Willis v. Westerfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2004No. 49A02-0211-CV-930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

VAIDIK, Judge.

On rehearing, the Willises raise three issues, one of which we find dispositive; namely, whether the trial court erred by instructing the jury on the affirmative de fense of failure to mitigate damages. Initially, we found no error in the trial court's decision to instruct the jury on the failure to mitigate defense. See Willis v. Westerfield, 803 N.E.2d 1147, 1155 (Ind.Ct.App.2004). Upon further reflection, we now reach the opposite conclusion.

The mitigation of damages doctrine is "the principle requiring a plaintiff, after an injury or breach of contract,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Nelson v. MarchandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. School City of Gary v. ClaudioIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Wilkinson v. SwaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API