Legal Opinion

Mroz v. Harrison

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2004No. 48A05-0402-CV-68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Defendant Joseph Mroz ("Mroz") appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff Robert Harrison ("Harrison"). We affirm.

Issues

Mroz raises four issues, which we consolidate and restate as:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to allow Mroz to refresh Harrison's recollection of an alleged fall, pursuant to Indiana Evidence Rule 612;

II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by permitting a doctor's deposition to be read into evidence based upon "exceptional cireum-stances," pursuant to Indiana Trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Modesitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Gaunt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Staton v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API