Legal Opinion

People v. Massicot

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 2002No. D035591PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’ROURKE, J.

A jury convicted David Massicot of two counts of indecent exposure with prior convictions for the same offense. (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. I.) Before trial, Massicot pleaded guilty to failure to register as a sex offender under section 290, subdivision (g)(1). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on formal probation for five years. Massicot contends the court violated his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial by misinterpreting the law so as to allow the jury to convict him of indecent exposure when he neither exposed his genitals to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CastanedaNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. CORTES MEDINABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
  4. Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich v. Vigilant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API