Legal Opinion

People v. Merriam

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1967No. Crim. 10651PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendant was charged by information with two counts of indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1), 1 a misdemeanor. The information also charged a prior conviction of the same crime in December of 1963. Defendant, represented by counsel, pleaded not guilty to each count of the information hut admitted the prior conviction. A jury found him guilty as charged. After appropriate diagnostic proceedings (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5500 et seq.; Pen. Code, § 1203.03), defendant was sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

The offense…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API