Legal Opinion

Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. Lipetzky

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2003No. C1-02-1747PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

The district court granted summary judgment canceling a contract for deed between respondents, vendors and vendees of farmland, after determining that the contract for deed provisions voided both the assignment of the contract for deed and the mortgage on the farmland securing the vendees’ debts to appellant, a bank. The district court also determined that appellant bank was not entitled to an equitable mortgage on the property. Because we conclude that the assignment of the contract for deed is precluded, we affirm on that issue; because we conclude that mortgage is not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API