Legal Opinion

Harris v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1945No. Civ. No. 12839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Respondents, as the assignees of some 2,200 school teachers, brought actions to recover certain sums claimed to be due the teachers. In 1931, pursuant to a stipulation entered into between the parties, a judgment was entered in respondents’ favor, the amount to be *45recovered to be thereafter calculated and determined by an accounting. A referee, Wilbur S. Owensby, was appointed to make the calculations, and some accounting was done which resulted in certain payments being made. Much litigation arose as a result of the various transactions (some of the details of which will…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Witaschek v. WitaschekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Miller v. ChesworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Most Worshipful Sons of Light Grand Lodge v. Sons of Light LodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API