Legal Opinion

Feld v. Merriam

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1983No. 2090 and 2303PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

Appellees, Samuel and Peggy Feld, brought suit against appellant, Cedarbrook Joint Venture (Cedarbrook) to recover for injuries which resulted from a criminal incident that originated in the garage of building number one of the Cedarbrook apartment complex on June 27, 1975. The Felds alleged that Cedarbrook had a duty to provide adequate security for its tenants and that the breach of this duty on the part of Cedarbrook was the proximate cause of their injuries. Following an eight day jury trial, a verdict was rendered in favor of the Felds. Peggy Feld was awarded two million…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. DiSalle v. P.G. Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Lewis v. PruittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API