Legal Opinion
Couch v. Cockroft
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 26, 1972PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHERNE, Judge.
The plaintiff, a dealer in new and used automobiles at Humboldt, Tennessee, sold to another dealer in used automobiles, H. L. Sartain of Millington, Tennessee, one new 1967 Cadillac automobile. The Cadillac was delivered to Sartain and possession surrendered to that purchaser. The certificate of origin issued by General Motors Corporation and the bill of sale from the plaintiff Couch to the buyer Sartain were attached to a draft drawn in favor of the plaintiff, which instruments were to be delivered to the buyer Sartain upon the draft being honored. The plaintiff Couch was a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Medico Leasing Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Linwood Harvestore, Inc. v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Humphrey Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SinardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Rockwin Corporation v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adams v. City National Bank &Trust Co. of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Heinrich v. Titus-Will Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Martin v. NagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Simson v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.