Legal Opinion

Heinrich v. Titus-Will Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 24, 1994No. 15042-5-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— Titus-Will Ford Sales, Inc., 1 appeals a judgment for replevin of a 1990 Ford pickup truck that Titus-Will had previously sold to dealer /broker James Wilson. Upon consideration of the entrustment and voidable title provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, we agree that Titus-Will must bear the burden of loss of payment for the vehicle. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in favor of Michael Heinrich, a third party bona fide purchaser for value.

In 1989 Michael Heinrich wished to buy a particular model new Ford pickup truck. James Wilson held himself out as a dealer/broker, licensed to buy…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Puget Sound National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Arkison v. Frontier Asset Management, LLC (In Re Skagit Pacific Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA v. HubertWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bank of America NT & SA v. David W. Hubert, P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API