Legal Opinion

Humphrey Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Sinard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1967No. Gen. 51,176 and 51,177PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bryant

This is an appeal from judgments of the Circuit Court of Cook County awarding possession of two Cadillac automobiles to the plaintiff, Humphrey Cadillac and Oldsmobile Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as Humphrey. Defendants’ theory on this appeal is: (1) That the plaintiff, by its agent and employee, William Warhurst, placed the Cadillac automobiles in the hands of a dealer in automobiles, and, by doing so, gave that dealer power to transfer all rights of the plaintiff in the automobiles; (2) that plaintiff Humphrey is bound by the acts of its agent and employee even though such acts may…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Correria v. Orlando Bank & Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Adams v. City National Bank &Trust Co. of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Couch v. CockroftCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. Cugnini v. Reynolds Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Godfrey v. GilsdorfNevada Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API