Legal Opinion

State v. Tarlton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jerauld County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. John Tarlton was convicted of malicious mischief, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

Upoh an- information filed by the state’s attorney of Jerauld county, the defendant, John Tarlton, in connection with three other persons, was charged and convicted of the offense of malicious mischief. The other .three persons named were acquitted under the direction of the court. The information, omitting the formal parts and the names of the three persons acquitted, is, in substance, as follows: That John Tarlton on the 17th day of February, 1907, within the county of Jerauld, state of South Dakota, did commit the offense of malicious mischief, and did on the date mentioned willfully,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinecke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Territory v. EganSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1882
  5. Wright v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rea v. Motors Ins. CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Schoenrock v. City of SissetonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  5. State v. AudissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API