Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1895No. 7339PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the district court for Platte county. Tried below before Sullivan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

It is by this proceeding sought to reverse a judgment of the district court for Platte county, whereby the plaintiff in error, Harriet Wright, was adjudged guilty of a violation.of section 210 of the Criminal Code. The information upon which the accused was convicted charges the knowingly owning, using, and occupying by her of a certain house or- building in said county for the purpose of prostitution. The provisions of the section above mentioned, so far as material to the questions presented by the record, are as follows: “Every house or building situated in this state, used and occupied as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maggard v. Van DuynNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Vindquest v. PerkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fitzgerald v. BenadomNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Salistean v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Darlington v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. EllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. EzellNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API