Legal Opinion

United States v. Delfrate

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1943No. 11321 CriminalPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This case was heard on defendant’s motion to quash the information, on the ground that the Emergency Price Control Act of January 30, 1942, Pub.Law 421, 77th Cong., 2nd Session, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 901-946, and the Maximum Price Regulation No. 169, adopted thereunder, effective December 16, 1942, are unconstitutional.

In an opinion filed herewith in the case of U. S. v. Alex Plarris et al., 54 F.Supp. 563, we held this Act constitutional. For the reasons there stated, we make the same ruling in this case.

The defendant raises an additional objection…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Landen v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. De Four v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  4. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Bowles v. National Erie Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API