Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Ford Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1938No. Appeal, 100PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Maxey,

This is an action in ejectment for possession of a dwelling in Chester, Pennsylvania. Appellees (plaintiffs. below) rely upon their record title against appellants’ claim based on an alleged parol exchange of lands, followed by their admitted possession of the premises over a number of years. The court below ruled that the evidence of the alleged oral agreement for exchange was insufficient to avoid the operation of the Statute of Frauds, and that appellees’ title must prevail. After trial, the jury found a verdict in defendants’ favor, but the court entered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Wright v. NultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Breniman v. BrenimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Glass v. TremellenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Sorber v. MastersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gray v. LeibertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Austin J. Richards, Inc. v. McClaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Kurland v. StolkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API