Legal Opinion

Austin J. Richards, Inc. v. McClafferty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1988No. 1165 and 1602PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Presently before the Court for review are summary judgments entered in separate actions, both of which were spawned by a disputed real estate transaction. Except for a common factual background, the issues are different and must be considered separately.

Austin J. Richards, Inc. v. Violet I. McClafferty

Violet I. McClafferty retained the services of the law firm of Davis and Abramovitz to assist her in selling real estate known as No. 719 Bellefonte Street, Pittsburgh. The employment of counsel was general, however, and there was no written agreement which defined the duties or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Rybas v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Smith v. GriffithsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Grimes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Petrongola v. Comcast-Spectacor, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Olson v. GrutzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API