Legal Opinion

State v. Ifill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 22, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

For the first time we must decide whether the result of a breath test performed by use of an Alcohol Level Evaluation Roadside Tester (ALERT) device is admissible at trial on a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Pamph.1988). Robert Ifill appeals his conviction entered on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (Somerset County, Chandler, J.). He challenges the submission, over his objection, of testimony concerning the result of an ALERT test administered by the arresting officer, the admission of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ReevesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. TraftonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. DeshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Mancini v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Wayne I. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. State v. IfillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. State v. MacLeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. State of Maine v. Graydon E. Adams Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API