State v. Pinkham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
This case is before us for the second time on the State’s pretrial appeal of a suppression order. In this appeal the State contests an order of the District Court (Skow-hegan, Clark, A.R.J.) suppressing defendant Ronald Pinkham’s refusal to take an approved blood alcohol breath test on the basis that he already had taken an unapproved “ALERT” pre-screening test. Pink-ham challenges the court’s denial of his motion to suppress all evidence that was the fruit of the stop of his automobile by a Skowhegan police officer. We affirm the court’s holding that the stop was lawful.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. IfillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ryan v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. VarneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Jacob v. KippaxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.