Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

This case is before us for the second time on the State’s pretrial appeal of a suppression order. In this appeal the State contests an order of the District Court (Skow-hegan, Clark, A.R.J.) suppressing defendant Ronald Pinkham’s refusal to take an approved blood alcohol breath test on the basis that he already had taken an unapproved “ALERT” pre-screening test. Pink-ham challenges the court’s denial of his motion to suppress all evidence that was the fruit of the stop of his automobile by a Skowhegan police officer. We affirm the court’s holding that the stop was lawful.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. State v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. IfillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. State v. VarneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Jacob v. KippaxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API