Legal Opinion

State v. Ifill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 21, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The defendant, Robert L. Ifill, appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (“OUI”), 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1989), after a jury trial in Superior Court (Somerset County, Alexander, J). Ifill contends that the Superior Court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence (1) that the State Trooper administered a roadside breath test using an Alcohol Level Evaluation Roadside Tester (“A.L.E.R.T.”) 1 prior to arresting Ifill; and (2) an unredacted implied consent form. We affirm the judgment.

This is Kill's second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. MylonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. KotsimpulosSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. State v. IfillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Derek S. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. State of Maine v. Wayne I. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Saucier v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. State v. MillaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. State of Maine v. Peter L. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API