Macilwaine v. Macilwaine (In re Macilwaine)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtKline, P.J.
*159In this appeal, Patricia Macilwaine contends that the trial court erred in granting John Macilwaine's request to modify an existing child support order pursuant to Family Code section 4057, subdivision (a)(3) 's extraordinarily high earner provision.1 Among the issues presented is how and when stock options factor into a supporting parent's gross income, a key factor in calculating child support under the statewide uniform guideline. Although stock options plainly constitute income for purposes of support, we must decide when employer-granted stock options must be recognized as "income," as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Guigne v. GuigneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sorge v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Destein v. DesteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of San Diego Dept. of Child etc. v. A.H. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- County of San Diego v. P.B. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of D.M. and G.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Marriage of Gallemore CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of Heath CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.