Jarvis v. Cory
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
In these consolidated cases petitioners Jarvis and Brodty seek writs of mandate declaring a salary appropriation bill unconstitutional and ordering respondent State Controller (Cory) to refrain from expending any funds pursuant to the bill. We must decide whether Senate Bill No. 91, 1979 Regular Session (SB 91), which awards a lump sum payment to certain state employees based on work already performed, violates provisions of the California Constitution that preclude the Legislature from enacting retroactive “extra compensation” for state employees (art. IV, § 17) and from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Abshire v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.