Burger v. Blair Medical Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
We allowed appeal to consider the statute of limitations governing a claim for breach of physician-patient confidentiality-
Appellee Diana Burger received medical treatment from a physician employed by Appellant Blair Medical Associates, Inc. (“BMA”) from 1996 until 2001. In October 1999, Appellee sustained a work-related injury. On October 28, 1999, she signed a medical authorization, permitting her employer’s worker’s compensation consultant to obtain medical records for the purpose of calculating the medical expenses occasioned by the work-related injury. In addition…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Maverick Steel Co. v. Dick Corporation/Barton MalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Finley v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Gabriel v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.