Legal Opinion

Burger v. Blair Medical Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2009No. 14 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

We allowed appeal to consider the statute of limitations governing a claim for breach of physician-patient confidentiality-

Appellee Diana Burger received medical treatment from a physician employed by Appellant Blair Medical Associates, Inc. (“BMA”) from 1996 until 2001. In October 1999, Appellee sustained a work-related injury. On October 28, 1999, she signed a medical authorization, permitting her employer’s worker’s compensation consultant to obtain medical records for the purpose of calculating the medical expenses occasioned by the work-related injury. In addition…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Maverick Steel Co. v. Dick Corporation/Barton MalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Finley v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  5. Gabriel v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API