Legal Opinion

Maverick Steel Co. v. Dick Corporation/Barton Malow

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2012PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.:

Appellant, Maverick Steel Company (“Maverick”) appeals from the judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of Dick Corporation, Barton Mallow Company, and their joint venture Dick Corporation/Barton Malow (“DBM”). We reverse and remand.

Maverick’s predecessor, Wilhelm & Kruse, Inc. (“W & K”), provided products and services for the PNC Stadium construction project (“Stadium Project”) pursuant to a structural steel subcontract with DBM. Claiming that W & K defaulted on its contract, DBM issued a default notice and sought coverage from W & K’s surety, United States…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Ira G. Steffy & Son, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Evans v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. PennEnergy v. Winfield ResourcesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. UniStrip Technologies, LLC v. LifeScan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. PennEnergy v. Winfield ResourcesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API