Maverick Steel Co. v. Dick Corporation/Barton Malow
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.:
Appellant, Maverick Steel Company (“Maverick”) appeals from the judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of Dick Corporation, Barton Mallow Company, and their joint venture Dick Corporation/Barton Malow (“DBM”). We reverse and remand.
Maverick’s predecessor, Wilhelm & Kruse, Inc. (“W & K”), provided products and services for the PNC Stadium construction project (“Stadium Project”) pursuant to a structural steel subcontract with DBM. Claiming that W & K defaulted on its contract, DBM issued a default notice and sought coverage from W & K’s surety, United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Ira G. Steffy & Son, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Evans v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- PennEnergy v. Winfield ResourcesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- UniStrip Technologies, LLC v. LifeScan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- PennEnergy v. Winfield ResourcesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.