Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Clinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1982PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Denman, J.

We here consider whether a psychiatrist must respond in damages to his former patient for disclosure of personal information learned during the course of treatment and, if he must, on what theory of recovery the action may be maintained. We hold that such wrongful disclosure is a breach of the fiduciary duty of confidentiality and gives rise to a cause of action sounding in tort.

The complaint alleges that during two extended courses of treatment with defendant, a psychiatrist, plaintiff revealed intimate details about himself which defendant later divulged to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  4. Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Chanko v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Alberts v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API