Legal Opinion
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Long
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 7, 1926No. 17907PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PHELPS, J.
At the regular primary election held in Oklahoma on August 3, 1926, there was submitted to the •oters of the state, as provided by our in-tiative and referendum laws, State Question \To. 141, Initiative Petition No\ 92, being an tot regulating the manner of assessing taxes, vhicb question was adopted by a vote of he people.
Section 2 of the act provided, in brief, bat when the county excise boards of the everal counties in the state have made their levies for taxation for the ensuing year for county, city, school district, and all other purposes for which they are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Whitener v. W. B. Belknap & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- United States v. William Brainer, Eugene Gressman, Esq., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.