Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Crouse

New York City Family Court

Decided September 15, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElizabeth Bass Golding, J.

Proceedings were instituted by the petitioner wife against the respondent husband for support of three minor children, to wit, John Joseph Crouse, born March 17, 1961, Mary Ruth Crouse, born April 5, 1962, and Vincent James Crouse, born March 30, 1964. The petitioner and respondent were married on June 25, 1960.

The respondent denied being responsible for the support of the said Vincent James Crouse, claiming that he was not the father of said minor child, and requested a blood grouping test *650pursuant to section 418 of the Family Court Act. The said test was ordered by the court and the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Clark v. RysedorphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Fitzsimmons v. De CiccoNew York City Family Court · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra C. v. Thomas J. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Hansom v. HansomNew York City Family Court · 1973
  3. Torino v. CruzNew York City Family Court · 1975
  4. Brian v. JohnsNew York City Family Court · 1974
  5. Tree v. RalstonNew York City Family Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API