Legal Opinion

Fitzsimmons v. De Cicco

New York City Family Court

Decided September 28, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHugh R. Elwyn, J.

In tMs paternity suit brought by the Commissioner of Public Welfare, Clara Suto, the mother of the child, testified that she had been keeping company with the respondent for about two years prior to the baby’s birth during which time she and the respondent occupied adjoining houses. Bach was a frequent visitor in the other’s home and, although ostensibly they occupied separate apartments, it appears that for all practical purposes they were living together during much of this time. Then in April, 1963, a month before the baby was born, Mrs. Suto dropped all pretense and actually moved into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Matter of ClausiNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Kehn v. MainellaNew York Family Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Croix v. DeyoNew York City Family Court · 1981
  2. Mannain v. LayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Martin v. LaneNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. Czajak v. VavoneseNew York City Family Court · 1980
  5. Lee v. StixNew York City Family Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API