Legal Opinion

Clark v. Rysedorph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hepeerhaít, J.

This proceeding was instituted by appellant to determine the paternity of a child born on the 9th day of May, 1949. After trial of the issues the learned Children’s Court Judge dismissed the proceeding and held that the “ evidence is not clear or convincing. Paternity has not been established.” The appellant is a widow and respondent is married. These parties became acquainted some time in 1946. Appellant testified that she kept steady company with respondent for five or six months when the relationship was terminated. She testified that later she again met respondent in August…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State, Ex Rel. Slovak v. HolodOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Hansom v. HansomNew York City Family Court · 1973
  4. Retzer v. RetzerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. State v. EliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API