Legal Opinion

Tree v. Ralston

New York City Family Court

Decided April 8, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Michael Potoker, J.

At the conclusion of the hearing in this paternity proceeding, the attorney for respondent moved the court to direct that the parties undergo a polygraph test to assist the court in determining their credibility. Counsel acknowledges that there is no legal authority for his request but insists that in matters of this kind where the parties offer no evidence or proof except their own testimony, the court is *583asked to make a determination solely upon the self-serving declarations of the respective parties.

In recent articles published in the New York Law Journal under “ Notes and Views ” (p. 1)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ForteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Clark v. RysedorphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Martin v. LaneNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. People v. Dobler, New York County Courts1961
  5. Fitzsimmons v. De CiccoNew York City Family Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schleimer v. SwannNew York City Family Court · 1978
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API