Legal Opinion

Preston v. Farmers Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1938No. 30288PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Plaintiff brought action against the Farmers Irrigation District, defendant and appellee, to recover damages of $2,656.74 to an 80-acre tract of ground and the crops growing thereon, because of the wrongful failure of defendant to deliver water from its canal for irrigation purposes. The jury returned a verdict for only $118.75, upon which judgment was entered. Plaintiff has- appealed.

Plaintiff sets out many assignments of error, among them that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence ■and is contrary to the evidence; that the verdict is so inadequate as to raise the presumption that it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bishop & Parsons v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Meier v. Bridgeport Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Mares v. ChaloupkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Nye v. AdamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Parkert v. Department of Public WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Dolen v. Beatrice Restaurant Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Consumers Cooperative Ass'n v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Preston v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API