Legal Opinion

Meier v. Bridgeport Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1925No. 23029PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosé, J.

This is an action to recover damages to crops on account of the failure of defendant, an irrigation district, to furnish to plaintiff his proportionate share of available water during the growing season of 1920. The irrigating system was in operation and the land on which the crops were growing was in the irrigation district. It was alleged in the petition that defendant negligently failed to apportion and distribute to plaintiff the water to which he was entitled and that the resulting damages were $13,340. The answer contained a general denial and a plea of contributory negligence.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Clarke v. Gering Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Dolen v. Beatrice Restaurant Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. McGrew Machine Co. v. One Spring Alarm Clock Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Omaha Life Insurance v. Gering & Ft. Laramie Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API