Legal Opinion

Preston v. Farmers Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1940No. 30933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages to his crops and land, in the sum of $2,656.74, occasioned by defendant’s failure to make delivery of irrigation water under his preferred water-right contract. On the first trial, the jury awarded him damages of only $118.75, and plaintiff appealed. The judgment was reversed for inadequacy of amount, and the case was remanded for a new trial. Preston v. Farmers Irrigation District, 134 Neb. 503, 279 N. W. 298. On the second trial, plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,477.50, and defendant has appealed.

The nature of the rights vested in plaintiff, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Vonburg v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Ledingham v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Miceli v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API