Legal Opinion

Mares v. Chaloupka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1923No. 22263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $510 in an action for personal injuries growing out of a collision between defendant’s car and a two-wheeled cart or sulky, in which he was riding on Main street in Wilber. Alleging inadequacy of the verdict, plaintiff appealed.

_ With respect to plaintiff’s injuries a physician testified that there was “a compound fracture of the head of the big bone” and that a bone “about one inch at the top and an inch at the base” ivas removed; that they used “a drainage tube and put on splints,” and that the Carrol-Daykin system of irrigation was used for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellsworth v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. KerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dolen v. Beatrice Restaurant Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Forrest v. MastersNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Preston v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API