Mares v. Chaloupka
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $510 in an action for personal injuries growing out of a collision between defendant’s car and a two-wheeled cart or sulky, in which he was riding on Main street in Wilber. Alleging inadequacy of the verdict, plaintiff appealed.
_ With respect to plaintiff’s injuries a physician testified that there was “a compound fracture of the head of the big bone” and that a bone “about one inch at the top and an inch at the base” ivas removed; that they used “a drainage tube and put on splints,” and that the Carrol-Daykin system of irrigation was used for a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ellsworth v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patterson v. KerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Dolen v. Beatrice Restaurant Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Forrest v. MastersNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Preston v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938