Legal Opinion

Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRY

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2010No. 35923PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS

HORTON, Justice.

Mr. Filadelfo Funes (Funes) sustained an on-the-job injury in January 2005. Funes argued before the Idaho Industrial Commission (Industrial Commission or Commission) that his injuries resulted in either permanent total disability or a substantial permanent partial disability. The Industrial Commission found that Funes was not totally disabled but had suffered a 25% permanent partial disability. Funes appeals, arguing that the Industrial Commission erred in its calculation or, in the alternative, that the Industrial Commission erred in not finding Funes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Splendid BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Zapata v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Eacret v. Clearwater Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ehrlich v. Delray Maughan, M.D., P. L. L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Brown v. Home DepotIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bergeman v. Select Portfolio ServicingIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Locker v. HOW SOEL, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API