Eacret v. Clearwater Forest Industries
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
The employer Clearwater Forest Industries and its surety Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (herein both called “Clear-water”) appeal the Industrial Commission’s decision not to apportion, under Idaho Code § 72-406(1), the permanent disability of the claimant William E. Eacret (herein “Eacret”) between the industrial accident and a preexisting physical impairment. We affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 2, 1994, Eacret injured his back while carrying a sixteen-foot-long, 2x10 board during the course of his employment as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reiher v. American Fine FoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Rivas v. K.C. LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Sund v. GambrelIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. Harper's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Todd L. Hamilton v. Alpha Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRYIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Bradford v. Roche Moving & Storage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.