Legal Opinion

Eacret v. Clearwater Forest Industries

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2002No. 26421PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

The employer Clearwater Forest Industries and its surety Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (herein both called “Clear-water”) appeal the Industrial Commission’s decision not to apportion, under Idaho Code § 72-406(1), the permanent disability of the claimant William E. Eacret (herein “Eacret”) between the industrial accident and a preexisting physical impairment. We affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 2, 1994, Eacret injured his back while carrying a sixteen-foot-long, 2x10 board during the course of his employment as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reiher v. American Fine FoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Rivas v. K.C. LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sund v. GambrelIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Anderson v. Harper's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Todd L. Hamilton v. Alpha Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRYIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Bradford v. Roche Moving & Storage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API