Legal Opinion

State v. Manzanares

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1928No. 3224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BICKLEY, J.

Appellant was convicted o^an assault with a deadly weapon.

He presented a motion for a new trial and arrest of judgment. As stated by appellant, the motions present three principal facts, as> follows:(1) That the verdict of the jury is against the evidence and the weight of the evidence, in that it shows that only one blow was struck with the deadly weapon, that the prosecuting witness testified that blow was struck by one of the two brothers of appellant, Enrique Manzanares or Malaquias Manzanares, while the wife of the prosecuting witness testified that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baca v. CatronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Eaton v. First Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. VincentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. EskildsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API