Legal Opinion

State v. Vincent

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2005No. 23,832PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} This ease raises issues pertaining to (1) whether Defendant’s court-appointed attorney had a conflict of interest, (2) whether Defendant made a valid waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, (3) whether Defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effectively represent himself, (4) whether Defendant made a valid plea of no contest to the charges while representing himself, and (5) whether Defendant received the effective assistance of standby counsel. We find no error and affirm Defendant’s judgment and sentence.

BACKGROUND

{2} The State alleged that on…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Reyes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  4. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. ValerioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. StallingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API