Legal Opinion

Eaton v. First Nat. Bank

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1918No. 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to District Court, Uni Action between William J. Eaton and the First National Bank of Delhart, Texas. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. O. P. Easterwood, of Clayton, and W. J. Eaton, of Socorro, for plaintiff in error. Joseph Gill, of Clayton, for «defendant in error.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

The plaintiff in error assigns nine reasons why the judgment of the trial court should be reversed. Each error assigned depends upon the record of the transcript of testimony and proceedings at the 'trial. That record is certified to by the stenographer, but was not made a part of the record by bill of exceptions, nor certified to by the trial judge. The certificate of the stenographer is not sufficient in itself to make such proceedings a part of the record for review here. Cox v. Duglas Candy Co., 22 N. M. 410, 163 Pac. 251; Rogers v. Crawford, 22 N. M. 365,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. Douglas Candy Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ManzanaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Garcia v. Universal Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API