Legal Opinion

Raney v. North Topeka Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1911No. 17,019PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The North Topeka Drainage District by condemnation proceedings appropriated land belonging to Raney for the purpose of constructing a dike to prevent the overflow of the Kansas river. Raney appealed *689to the district court from the award of damages. The jury fixed the damages at the sum of $2000 and allowed interest thereon from the time the dike was constructed. The drainage district appeals from this judgment.

The principal error claimed relates to the instructions. The court refused to instruct the jury as follows: ■

“The condemnation and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Leavenworth, Topeka & Southwestern Railway Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of State Highway Com'r.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Flemming v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Bruna v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Rogers v. Kansas Coöperative Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API