Legal Opinion

Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1904No. 13,625PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from Barton district court; Ansel R. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J. :

At its session in 1899 the legislature enacted the following provision for the condemnation of lands for the storage of water :

“Any irrigation, canal or reservoir company, for the purpose of establishing any reservoir, lake or pond for the storage of water, shall have the right to condemn lands in the same manner as is provided for the condemnation of lands for railroad and other purposes.” (Laws 1899, ch. 151, §1; Gen. Stat. 1901, §3758.)

Under this law the Lake Koen Navigation, Reserr voir and Irigation Company condemned a tract of land in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. LaboreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. WillitsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. ConeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kansas City, Olathe, Lawrence & Topeka Railway Co. v. WeidenmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API