Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Carson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1949No. 37,639PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was a proceedings for the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The Great Lakes Pipe Line Company, a corporation, hereafter referred to as the Company, appeals from a judgment fixing the damages of the landowners.

In its petition for exercise of the right of eminent domain the Company stated it desired to acquire a thirty-foot right of way to construct pipe line or lines parelleling and adjacent to its two *101existing lines “to be buried at least two feet under the surface of the ground” over lands owned by Charles E. Scott, and which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Smith v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Flemming v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Bruna v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas-Missouri Power Company v. HamlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Independent School District v. C. B. Lauch Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Burke v. Board of Education of Common School District No. 110Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. EatherlyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. Herman v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API