Rogers v. Kansas Coöperative Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finley, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The plaintiff, while working in the capacity of stillman at the defendant’s oil refinery, was burned by hot tar. He recovered judgment for damages from which defendant appeals.
What is called the tar line consists of a three-incn iron pipe one hundred and fifty feet long, which runs from the still to the pump house. In the process of refining the oil a residue of heated tar and oil accumulates in the line which it is necessary to remove before it cools and becomes coked. At the front of the still there was a three-inch iron plug on the end of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Every v. RainsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Howard v. City of Osage CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Raney v. North Topeka Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heck v. Quindaro TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Hayes v. NutterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Rogers v. Kansas Cooperative Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914