Legal Opinion
Wintz v. Northrop Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 4, 1997No. 96-1161PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants Van Wintz and Jill Wintz, both individually and on behalf of their daughter Jessica (the ‘Wintzes”), appeal the district court’s order granting the jointly-filed motion for summary judgment of defendants-appellees Northrop Corporation (“Northrop”) and Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). The Wintzes sought damages for injuries allegedly suffered by Jessica as a result of her in útero exposure to the chemical bromide, allegedly contained in photographic developing material manufactured by Kodak and used by Jill Wintz in the course of her employment with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jennie A. Mayer v. Gary Partners and Company, Limited, and K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Andrew Wilson v. City of Chicago, Jon BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Constance DEIMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINCINNATI SUB-ZERO PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Clayton W. Clark v. Takata Corporation, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,373 Nathaniel Ancho v. Pentek CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- McCaleb v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.