Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,373 Nathaniel Ancho v. Pentek Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 6, 1998No. 97-1378PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Nathaniel Ancho (“Ancho”), appeals the trial court’s order barring testimony from his expert witness and granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee herein, Pentek Corporation (“Pentek”). Ancho claims that the court committed reversible error in failing to properly articulate and apply the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Phm'maceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), standard for assessing the admissibility of expert testimony. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The Jefferson Smurfit Corporation employed Nathaniel Ancho…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Casio, Inc. v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Cherrye Bradley v. Pickens BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Richard Walker v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Salem, Maurice J. v. Neshewat, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Balkar Dhillon v. Crown Controls CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.