Legal Opinion

Fielder v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 2, 1977No. 76-100-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

This civil action to recover under the uninsured motorists provisions of two automobile liability insurance policies issued by the defendant insurance company was heard on an agreed statement of facts by a Superior Court justice sitting without a jury. It is now here on the plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment denying liability .

It appears that plaintiffs, Mark D. Fielder, a minor, and his father, Douglas B. Fielder, were insured under two automobile liability insurance policies issued by defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company to the father. Both policies contained uninsured motorists…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. TomanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. FuscoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. ChastainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. MacAluso v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  2. Griffith v. Farm & City Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Sorbo v. MendiolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Vadnais v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Altieri v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API