Legal Opinion

Vadnais v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1984No. C3-84-468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking a declaration of his rights to uninsured motorist coverage from insurance policies under which he was an insured. Cross motions for summary judgment were submitted to the court on stipulated facts. The court entered summary judgment for the insurers, and the plaintiff appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts were stipulated. David Vad-nais, the plaintiff, was a passenger in a vehicle owned by Roy Wehking when it was struck by a vehicle owned by Clare McEvoy and driven by George Holloway. McEvoy did not have any liability insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. ChastainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ByrumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sorbo v. MendiolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. ReilingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API