United States ex rel. Lupo v. Quality Assurance Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF/RELATOR’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge
Defendants Quality Assurance Services, Inc. (“QAS”), Glenn Russell Deacon, Glenn *1024Russell Deacon II, Susan Deacon, and Shelly Becker (collectively, “Defendants”) move the court to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) of Relator Erin Hayes Lupo for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 18.) Relator opposes the motion. (Doc. No. 19.) The court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Tam v. Qualcomm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- City of San Diego v. Invitation Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Crone v. Tracy Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Dias v. Burberry LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.